"It's not depressing, it's tragic."
Nov. 15th, 2006 10:34 amI was watching "Brideshead Revisited" last night, much to the mystification of, well, everyone. The general refrain is "Why are you watching that again, it's so depressing." But I don't agree. Granted, this is not a happy story by any stretch. But there is a difference between depressing and tragic, and I think this falls firmly on the tragic side.
AAACK! Why are they remaking Brideshead? I really don't think this is necessary...the 1981 production is so perfect. I honestly think it's the best book adaptation I've ever seen.
Dear Andrew Davies:
As much as I have enjoyed your adaptations in the past, especially "Vanity Fair" and "The Way We Live Now", please back away slowly from this proposed production of "Brideshead Revisited". I understand you may still be flushed with a feeling of invincibility after the "Pride and Prejudice" incident (about which I will not speak...I have the 1980 production and David Rintoul to soothe my offended spirit), but leave this one lie.
While the "comedic touches" your adaptations are known for may draw in the mainstream modern audience more reliably than a more nuanced script, any attempt to make Brideshead "fun" will destroy the tone which gives such poignancy to Waugh's novel and the '81 production. (You may have heard of it...Laurence Olivier, John Gielgud, Claire Bloom, Anthony Andrews...)
As a final warning and inducement to caution, remember the modernized "Othello".
Sincerely,
Me